3 Bad Reasons to Claim Social Security at 65

If you're not acquainted with how Social Security functions, you may presume that there's a single age at which eligible receivers need to apply for benefits. Not so.

You actually get an eight-year window to insurance claim benefits that begin at age 62 and go on till age 70. (Technically, you're not required to apply for advantages at 70, but there's no financial incentive not to.) Smack in the middle of that window is 65, an age often related to retirement.

Here are a few wrong reasons to take benefits then.

Do you think it's your full retirement age?

Your full retirement age is the age at which you're qualified to take your full month-to-month Social Security benefits based upon your earning history.

That age used to be 65, as life expectancies have actually raised, older workers have been required to wait on accumulating their advantages in full.

Presently, the full retirement age for people born between 1943 and 1954 is 66.

Those born in 1960 or later have a full retirement age of 67, as well as for those born between 1955 and 1959, full retirement is 66 and a few more months. For that reason, to take benefits at 65 would mean reducing monthly benefits.

1. What kind of reduced benefits are we discussing?

It relies on your complete old age, yet you'll lose roughly 6.67% of your complete month-to-month benefit for each year you apply early. Therefore, if you're looking at the full old age of 67 yet claim benefits at 65, you'll lower your benefits by 13.34%. The ordinary existing monthly benefit is about $1,400, so if that's what you're eligible for at a complete old age of 67, yet you submit at 65 instead, you'll obtain a little over $1,200 as opposed to $1,400.

2. You assume you're needed to sign up for Medicare and also Social Security all at once

Many people have a tendency to connect Social Security with Medicare, thinking the two programs are interrelated, but they do have mutual regulations. 

One essential distinction is that Medicare eligibility begins at age 65. Also, you have to sign up for Medicare approximately 3 months before the month of your 65th birthday to get things started. 

But don't confuse Medicare eligibility with that of Social Security. Practical as it may appear to apply for both simultaneously, you'll reduce your Social Security benefits by going that route.

Though you're enabled to apply for Social Security as early as age 62, Medicare has a company eligibility age of 65 unless you qualify as a rare exception. 

Consequently, you must generally enroll in the two programs independently unless there's an engaging factor to claim Social Security at 65.

3. You think Social Security will run out of money if you wait

Many Americans file for Social Security before retirement age because they're worried the program is going broke and want to get their hands on their money while they still can. So, let's quell that rumor since it's somewhat unjustified. 

While it's true that the program is encountering some economic difficulties and may need to reduce advantages in the future if Congress does not fix it, there's no reason to think Social Security is disappearing. 

The program can maintain benefits at their present degree until 2034, which leaves lawmakers more years to resolve its future shortfall. Consequently, you should not hurry to file for benefits at 65 because you don't want to wait any longer.

Naturally, there are some scenarios where claiming Social Security at 65 isn't a negative suggestion. For instance, if you find yourself out of work, it's much better to take benefits than acquire credit card debt to pay your living expenditures. 

Yet if you're filing at 65 for any of the above reasons, you're doing yourself an injustice that can come back to bite you in retirement.